Congressional Oversight of Blackwater Hampered by Lack of Documents
By Anupama Narayanswamy Oct 16 2007 6:56 p.m. 2 commentsNine months before Blackwater
One member who requested information to bring some oversight and accountability to the Blackwater found that neither the State Department nor the Defense Department complied with his request for documents.
On Jan. 29, 2007, Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., wrote to the Secretary of Defense asking for all documents relating to Blackwater contracts. The Congressman read news articles about Blackwater's various missions for U.S. government agencies overseas which prompted him to contact the Defense Department," Brian Alberts, a spokesman for Cohen, wrote via e-mail. We also sent an identical letter to the State Department on the same day, but they never responded."
In the weeks preceding Cohen's inquiry, Blackwater was involved in a number of incidents that received press coverage; the most widely reported involved a Christmas Eve shooting by a Blackwater employee of an Iraqi security officer and a mid-January crash of a Blackwater helicopter. Blackwater was also in the news for other issues, including getting a contract to train military personnel in
Alberts was uncertain which story prompted Cohen's inquiry.
Other members of Congress appear to have been prompted to seek information on Blackwater on behalf of constituents concerned about the company, logs of correspondence between members of Congress and the Defense Department show.
Our Freedom of Information Act requests for the letters themselves are still pending; Cohen's office emailed us a Word document containing the text of his letter.
Three Months Later
The Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) replied to Cohen's letter on April 24 -- long after the Feb. 5 deadline Cohen set in his letter -- and provided a list of Blackwater contracts, but none of the actual contract documents that Cohen had requested. That list was not comprehensive, but included only contracts administered by the OSD.
In its reply, OSD also informed Cohen that his letter was being treated as a FOIA request, which seems to be the accepted procedure for all requests even from Members of Congress. According to these Department of Justice guidelines, if a congressional request for oversight information from does not come from a committee or subcommittee chairman, it is to be treated as a regular FOIA request. As journalists can well attest, that means that very often members' offices need to wait months before receiving any documents.
OSD's response to Cohen further suggested that for the actual contract documents, the representative's office would have to send out FOIA requests to agencies within Defense -- the Army, Navy, Air Force, Defense Logistics Agency and the U.S. Special Operations Command, for example -- directly. Alberts told us that Cohen's office is planning on sending out FOIA requests to these departments for further information but has yet to do so.
As for the State Department, Cohen's office has taken no action since sending out its initial request for information on Blackwater.
The limited information that Cohen's office received shows that Blackwater does far more than provide bodyguards in
Since 2000, Blackwater
Constituent Claims about Blackwater
The other five letters were directed to the assistant secretary of Defense for legislative affairs; letters directed to this office are generally inquiries from constituents forwarded by members of Congress, according to Dave Martinez, a DoD Freedom of Information official. The subject of one such letter, sent in January to DoD from the office of Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., was About Blackwater USA Contracts," according the correspondence log.
Two other letters from constituents, forwarded to DoD by the office of Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., in April have intriguing, if harsh, subject lines reading, Blackwater is running around with military weapons doing military things they should be held accountable just like the agency" and Stop Erik Price the founder of Blackwater"
The subject of a May letter sent by the office of Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W. Va., was Concern regarding the actions of Lieutenant General Gary North in response to an attack by Blackwater USA," most likely a reference to court martial proceedings held for two Air Force personnel who had an altercation with a Blackwater employee. All charges against the men were ultimately dropped; Lieutenant General Gary North was head of Central Command of the Air Force during the case.
The office of Sen. Herb Kohl, D-Wis., sent a letter in May from a constituent Concerned about tax dollars paying to fund private militia Blackwater," according to the DoD correspondence log. Although Kohl's office did not release the letter, they confirmed that it was from a constituent asking DoD to release information on what services the federal government has paid Blackwater for and the amounts of the contracts," Joe Bonfiglio, Kohl's press secretary said.
Search the Blog
Related Content
- Correspondence 21
- Logs_6553 19
Real Time Ticker
Recent Posts
Reporting we're watching
- OpenSecrets: Millionaire Freshmen Make Congress Even Wealthier
- Sunlight Foundation: The Political Spending of 501(c)(4) Nonprofits in the 2012 Election
- Sunlight Foundation: Watch TransparencyCamp ideas grow!
- Sunlight Foundation: Integrating the US' Documents
- Sunlight Foundation: 2Day in #OpenGov 5/20/2013




This is a garbage story
Oversight & Accountability?
During an ongoing 18 years there has been no U.S. Congress Project 7210 response, i.e., for a 135 decibel (dB) to 177 dB. jet-engine noise level certain injuries to flight line personnel. This unprotected 1952-1956 exposure was in direct disobedience of the 1948 Air Force Regulation (AFR) 160-3 at 95 dB. Max. An unable to locate was the for 77 others Project 7210 and previously in-hand over one foot high stack of from 1952 evidence; 4/4/08 Board of Veterans Appeals letter.
Again provided were over 100 VA certified copies of the veterans still in-hand proof of the Project 7210 consequences, the Menieres disease and 100% unemployability awards. In reference to these award determining resubmissions, a VA 10/16/08 letter noted ...because of insufficient or inaccurate information we cannot identify the proper record. Part of the evidence was of the VA Boston Regional Office Rating Boards 7/9/57 clear and unmistakable error (CUE) of their awarded hearing loss only. This is proven by the again resubmitted 4/26/57 examining physicians 4/3/58 submission of the before the 7/9/57 Board CUE evidence that resulted in the still to-date ignored USAF SURGEONS 6/25/58, PERMANENTLY MEDICALLY DISQUALIFIED FOR MILITARY SERVICE!
The 130 page July 1956 USAF Project 7210 Technical Report (TR) 54-401 records the noise levels for 27 versions of 10 jet-engines in 1952 to 1956 U. S. Military service; see contrails.iit.edu, under its search use TR 54-401". The flight line overall very high noise levels range from 135 dB, at a 6,144 sound pressure multiple (X), to 177 dB (@ 815,583 X)! This with this veterans in-hand documentation could help the 77, e.g., Had some trouble with hearing while working on warm-up crew for F-86 D with very high noise levels. The physicians 29 Jan. 54 USAF Cadet Wing Commander washout statement. All flight line personnel at Tyndall AFB, Panama City, FLA. were unprotected and subjected to the very high noise levels. All worked well within a 50 feet radius and were injured in direct disobedience of the AFR 160-3 required protection. For F-86D personnel it is the then 1952 known certain J47-GE-1 jet-engine injury, i.e., TR pages 68-75, Test Group 10, Date of the Tests: 1952, Test Numbers 62-64". This is an at 50 feet 158 dB noise level with an 87,381 X. Fifteen (15) of the 77 were repeatedly exposed to a warm-up crew 176 dB level of over 699,051 X vs. the AFR 160-3, 95 dB at 59 X! The AMA Family Medical Guide 3d edition, page 365 is the sound pressure multiple (X) source. Its 60 dB Normal conversation is the base line for the calculated ...sound pressure doubles with an increase of 6 decibels 87,381 X to 699,051 X.
The question is not if these 77 unprotected individuals were injured but how badly!
AIR FORCE SERIAL NUMBERS (AFSN) ARE AVAILABLE FOR EACH OF THE LISTED 77 OTHER USAF PERSONNEL.
1952 - 1956 JET AIRCRAFT MECHANICS, AFSC 43131H AND 43151C.
NO. NAME. NO. NAME.
1. APPLEYARD, WILLIAM L. 40. HOWARD, ROY W.
2. BATES, JOE H. 41. HOWARTH, WALLACE R.
3. BAVIS, HARRY G. 42. HURLEY, DAVID W.
4. BERRY, DENNIE 43. IENSE, WILLIAM A.
5. BERSTRON, ELLERY D. 44. IRVIN, JAMES E.
6. BERTRAND, ROBERT E. 45. JANDRON, PAUL J.
7. BONASERA, JOSEPH E. 46. JONES, GLEN R.
8. BONE, J. E. 47. JONES JR, BOBBY
9. BRITTAIN, THOMAS W. 48. JUNG, WESLEY E.
10. BUMPUS, JOE E. 49. JUSTICE, HERMAN M.
11. CADRETTE, EUCLID J. 50. KEAN, RONALD B.
12. CARNEY, JOHN F. 51. KELLY, HAROLD R.
13. CLARK JR, CHESTER H. 52. KELLY JR, GERALD L.
14. CODORI, JOSEPH B. 53. LARKOWSKI, GERALD G.
15. COUNCIL JR, JAMES I. 54. LEWIS JR, FRANKLIN
16. CRISWELL, WILLIAM G. 55. LOCKIEY, REGINAID E.
17. DONALDSON, WILLIAM A. 56. LOGSDON, ELMO W.
18. DUESLER, JOHN H. 57. LONG, EARL T.
19. DUNBAR, LEROY W. 58. LOVE, JERRY K.
20. EWTON, JAMES E. 59. LYCAN, EDWARD S.
21. FLENING, JACK E. 60. MORGAN, WARNER L.
22. FRITZ, JOHN A. C. 61. MULLINS, JIMMY A.
23. GILAM, JAT T. 62. MURPHEY, TALMADGE G.
24. GOMES JR, MANUEL F. 63. MURRAY, WILLIE E.
25. GONES, LEAMON 64. MUSGRAVE PAUL I.
26. GORE, WILLIAM R. 65. OGBORN, GLENN
27. GREEN, LEVI D. 66. OTTLEY, FRANKLIN D.
28. GUILA, MIKE J. 67. RATHJEN. CHARLES
29. GUNSLAUS, DAVID W. 68. REID, BILLY G.
30. HANDLIN, JAMES F. 69. RICHARDSON, JAMES W.
31. HARDING, JERRY L. 70. SANDELL, PHILLIP R.
32. HARTER, JOHN E. 71. SEXTON, FRED B.
33. HENDON, JAMES 72. SHUMATE, RICHARD W.
34. HENDON, JAMES H. 73. VOLLENTINE, DONALD R.
35. HIGNUTT, JESSE L. 74. WALLER, GLENN R.
36. HILL, RAY S. 75. WHITE, SAMUEL L.
37. HINSON, BERT L. 76. WOOD, LEONARD F.
38. HIRSH, DONALD H. 77. ZIEGLER, CARL P.
39. HODGE, JAMES F.