Fighting net neutrality, telecom companies, outside lobbyists, cluster contributions to members of Congress

While the Federal Communications Commission considers the first steps toward ensuring net neutrality--making certain that broadband providers do not discriminate against high traffic sites--the telecom firms that would be affected by the rules and their trade groups have been swamping Congress with a one-two punch of campaign contributions from the companies and their registered lobbyists. Some 244 members of Congress were the beneficiaries of these contribution clusters--totaling more than $9.4 million--from January 2007 to June 2009, an investigative collaboration of the Sunlight Foundation and the Center for Responsive Politics has found. Telecom interests and their lobbyists engaged in more clustered giving than any industry save pharmaceuticals.

Overall, the top recipient of the largess was Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who took in $894,379 (many of those contributions were directed to his 2008 presidential campaign). The telecom interests also targeted House and Senate leaders: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., was next with $341,089, followed by House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md. ($275,275), Senate Finance Committee chair Max Baucus, D-Mont. ($248,999) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell ($198,972).

Broadband providers have attempted to enlist members of Congress in an effort to block action on net neutrality rules by the FCC. Verizon and AT&T have been particularly active in this effort; they also were the sources of all the clustered contributions among broadband providers, with AT&T and its outside lobbyists combining to give to 110 members, followed by Comcast (105 members) and Verizon (96 members).

The analysis was based on a survey of giving by eight large broadband providers and two trade associations that represent them, all of which have disclosed lobbying on net neutrality issues. We looked for outside lobbyists of these interests who contributed to the same members of Congress as their clients had. For example, 55 lobbyists who reported AT&T as a client collectively contributed

$170,800 to Sen. John McCain; AT&T's employees, their family members, and its political action committee contributed

$206,438 to McCain. The greater the number of such clusters coming from a particular interest, the more likely it is that that member is being targeted by the interest.

As noted <a href="http://thehill.com/hillicon-valley/605-technology/64373-report-telecom-firms-shower-lamakers-with-money-in-net-neutrality-fight">here</a>, for example, McCain introduced legislation today to block the FCC from writing net neutrality regulations.

As Congress considers legislation that would codify net neutrality into law, telecom firms are hoping to cut a better deal on Capitol Hill than they are likely to get from the FCC.

Biggest Clusters: Top telecom industry client-lobbyist contributions

Client

Member

No. of Lobbyists*

Client contributions

Lobbyist contributions

AT&T Inc

McCain, John

55

$206,438

$170,800

AT&T Inc

McConnell, Mitch

39

$18,500

$66,050

AT&T Inc

Cornyn, John

26

$13,750

$33,900

AT&T Inc

Wicker, Roger

26

$11,750

$33,625

AT&T Inc

Baucus, Max

25

$4,000

$37,300

AT&T Inc

Pryor, Mark

22

$14,500

$18,500

AT&T Inc

Hoyer, Steny H

21

$23,000

$47,775

AT&T Inc

Chambliss, Saxby

21

$18,400

$33,350

AT&T Inc

Blunt, Roy

21

$10,500

$62,650

AT&T Inc

Cantor, Eric

21

$10,500

$49,500

AT&T Inc

Udall, Mark

21

$6,500

$24,183

AT&T Inc

Landrieu, Mary L

20

$16,030

$27,000

Comcast Corp

McCain, John

30

$62,452

$70,925

Comcast Corp

McConnell, Mitch

27

$19,500

$49,322

Comcast Corp

Rockefeller, Jay

23

$25,000

$25,200

Comcast Corp

Reid, Harry

21

$57,400

$62,200

Comcast Corp

Baucus, Max

21

$27,500

$33,499

Comcast Corp

Warner, Mark

21

$18,883

$21,483

National Cable & Telecommunications Assn

McCain, John

31

$21,200

$73,550

National Cable & Telecommunications Assn

Warner, Mark

23

$6,000

$24,983

Time Warner

McCain, John

30

$31,733

$71,550

Time Warner

Warner, Mark

23

$29,350

$28,350

Time Warner

Reid, Harry

22

$38,800

$66,450

Time Warner

Rockefeller, Jay

21

$12,000

$22,500

Verizon Communications

McCain, John

59

$64,126

$159,527

Verizon Communications

Warner, Mark

39

$36,300

$49,800

Verizon Communications

Baucus, Max

39

$35,000

$56,250

Verizon Communications

McConnell, Mitch

34

$21,750

$53,750

Verizon Communications

Reid, Harry

34

$7,000

$76,589

Verizon Communications

Rockefeller, Jay

30

$28,000

$35,850

Verizon Communications

Meek, Kendrick B

30

$5,650

$35,648

Verizon Communications

Pryor, Mark

28

$3,000

$33,350

Verizon Communications

Dodd, Chris

27

$1,500

$62,600

Verizon Communications

Cantor, Eric

26

$29,200

$64,800

Verizon Communications

Udall, Mark

26

$4,950

$30,616

Verizon Communications

Roberts, Pat

25

$6,250

$29,850

Verizon Communications

Clyburn, James E

24

$18,500

$41,455

Verizon Communications

Hoyer, Steny H

23

$40,300

$50,700

Verizon Communications

Cornyn, John

23

$10,000

$25,100

Verizon Communications

Durbin, Dick

22

$13,700

$28,350

Verizon Communications

Collins, Susan M

21

$35,450

$27,900

Verizon Communications

Johnson, Tim

21

$6,500

$25,600

*Number of lobbyists refers to the total number of outside lobbyists retained by an individual client who gave to the member.

Comments

  1. JPB

    A Who's Who of who buys and bought our Congress, especially the "Representatives for Life" members. The list shows how much private money they payed to and for each elected public servant's allegiance and the expectation of present and future service. Note, while the two party system has more than one owner, this ownership tends to produce only pro-owner legislative outcomes."America has no native criminal class, except Congress." Mark Twain

  2. Paul Emmett

    Let me know who to contribute to raise electoral challenges to the people who want to destroy net neutrality.

  3. BJ

    Paul Emmett, that's a good thing to do, put money on the side with the white hats, but the problem is that when you do that, the Congress Critter you just contributed to may be wearing a Black Hat on a different issue-- like health care reform or the War in Afghanistan (depending on which industries they have in their legislative district.)The answer here is not just to better direct our campaign contributions, it's to reform Campaign Finance so that Congress can't take campaign money from Lobbyists or Corporations.

  4. jim platt

    We the people need to unite against the lobbying that goes on in our country. It seems to me the lobbyist should be called exactly what they are:ExtortionistsKidnapperscheatersThief'sLye rsBribersIt seems that the companies they represent aren't happy unless they can squeeze the last drop of blood or money out of us and we put up with it Lobbying should be ILLEAGLE especially when it looks and smells like one of the word listed here

  5. Kareem

    What is simply shocking to me coming to the US as an immigrant is how the whole lobbying system is not seen as bribing? Someone "contributes" to a politician for their vote on a favorable "circumstance". Boy if this is not legalized bribery I don't know what is! ... and I thought Pakistan was a corrupt nation.

Leave Us a Comment

Search the Blog