Visclosky shuts out former PMA Group clients
By Bill Allison Apr 03 2009 7:54 p.m. 3 commentsRep. Pete Visclosky was one of the top recipients of contributions from PMA Group. He endorsed some form of investigation of the lobbying firm that was raided by the FBI -- "What form that action takes, who offers it, how it will turn out, I don't know," he said last month. In his fiscal year 2010 earmark requests, just posted online, he requested no earmarks for former clients of PMA Group.
I noticed that he requested an earmark for Duneland School Corporation of Chesterton, Ind. for $500,000 that will "include the installation of solar panels to demonstrate photovoltaic technology and help power the school," among other things. The name rang a bell because it turned up in my search for new lobbying registrations by state and local governments and public school systems. LNE Group represented the school system -- they have a PAC, though they didn't make any contributions to Visclosky in the 2008 cycle.
Search the Blog
Related Content
- Campaign Finance 211
- Earmarks 121
- Handy Tools 72
- Lobbying 159
- PMA Group 23
- Rep. Pete Visclosky 3
Real Time Ticker
Recent Posts
- Mayors Against Illegal Guns runs ad backing Nevada background checks
- Thanks to lobbying, farm bill yields crop insurance funds
- Surge of immigration lobbyists fueled by push for high-skilled foreign workers
- Health group airs ad backing Obama EPA nominee
- Apple lobbies on taxes more than any other subject
Reporting we're watching
- OpenSecrets: Millionaire Freshmen Make Congress Even Wealthier
- OpenSecrets: Wall Street Shaped Bill Easing Oversight, and Kept Contributions Coming
- Sunlight Foundation: House's Legislative Data and Transparency Conference a Success
- Sunlight Foundation: OpenGov Voices: Data.gov relaunches on open source platform CKAN
- Sunlight Foundation: 2Day in #OpenGov 5/24/2013




[...] April 3rd, we noted that Rep. Pete Visclosky, one of the most prolific recipients of campaign cash from and earmarker [...]
[...] say, Rep. Peter Visclosky, under investigation for his ties to PMA Group, who didn’t request any earmarks for the firm’s former clients according to his disclosures. 2) When I ran the contribution [...]
[...] himself from the lobbying shop as questions swelled around his relationship with it; he requested no earmarks for past clients of the firm for [...]