POIA aims to make public records truly public
By Bill Allison Mar 16 2010 2:45 p.m. 1 commentAccording to a procurement officer in the Transportation Department, SF-LLLs, a disclosure form filed by lobbyists when they help their clients pursue contract or grant awards, are filed away with other contracting documents and "kept in a secure place so no one has access to the them." This, despite the fact that, in fine print on the lower left hand side of the document are the words, "This information will be available for public inspection."
All over Washington, paper and electronic records of documents labeled "public disclosure" or "available for public inspection" and the like are inaccessible to the vast majority of citizens because there is no requirement for government to post this information on the Internet. To address this, Rep. Steve Israel introduced the Public Online Information Act, which would require such documents to be easily accessible--at the click of a mouse.
The act is necessary, because public doesn't always mean available. The Office of Government Ethics (OGE) has financial disclosure forms for top government officials. To get copies, one has to call the office and request them--and no more than six at a time. To get financial disclosure forms for the nine members of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission (also known as BRAC) required two requests; to get forms for the top 100 officials of the then incoming Bush Administration (something my former employer, the Center for Public Integrity, undertook in 2001) required 17 separate requests spread out over 17 business days, including 17 separate trips to OGE's New York Avenue headquarters in Washington, D.C.
But at least those documents are accessible with an in-person visit (OGE will also mail the forms--six at a time--to requesters). SF-LLLs are not available for public inspection in any meaningful form, as we learned when we started calling agencies trying to get them. Though we were aware of dozens of cases in which companies had hired outside lobbyists to help them win contracts--the Coast Guard contract won by a joint venture Lockheed Martin and Northrup Grumman to revamp its vessels being a prime example--we were unable to get our hands on a single one of these documents "available for public inspection."
Were the forms accessible, journalists and the public would be able to distinguish between organizations that win federal money solely by having the best bid, and those that enhance their chances by playing the influence game. Requiring agencies to put these public documents online would open a window into how much of a role lobbyists play in federal contracting and grant making decisions--as well as many other windows into the workings of Washington.
Search the Blog
Real Time Ticker
Recent Posts
- JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon met with Treasury Secretary on Volcker in March
- Trying to track JPMorgan? Treasury Dodd-Frank meeting logs not up to date
- Super PAC profile: Ending Spending aids Palin-endorsed Senate hopeful in Nebraska
- JPMorgan better at hedging political bets than financial investments?
- JPMorgan not alone
Reporting we're watching
- Sunlight Foundation: On the revolving door, a correction and a proposal
- Sunlight Foundation: 2Day in #OpenGov 5/16/2012
- OpenSecrets: Did OpenSecrets.org Foil A Chinese Propaganda Hit?
- Sunlight Foundation: Survey finds attack ads work, though better on some voters than others
- OpenSecrets: Violence Against Women Act Focus of Heavy Lobbying




There were several stores in the Post recently on how the Securities and Exchange Commission is considering changing its settlement agreement policy to release more details about investigations, The Washington Post reported this at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/31/AR2010033103674.html Currently, the SEC allows companies and individuals to negotiate settlements without a public trial or admission of wrongdoing and the only public records generated are settlement agreements, which are typically only one or two pages in length. "The SEC is premised on the idea that sunlight is the best disinfectant, and a nontransparent settlement harms the SEC's reputation," John Coffee, a securities law professor at Columbia University, told the Post. Companies would still be able to avoid admitting fault, but now the public would be able to see more detail about the SEC's investigation. Proponents say the new policy would aid in the filing of parallel class action suits and increase the public's confidence in the SEC and its ability to regulate the financial sector.