Sunlight Foundation

Senate approves financial reform in a late night vote

The Senate passed sweeping financial reform legislation last night, aimed at keeping the financial sector from collapsing as it did in 2008. The final vote was 59-39, with four Republicans joining the majority party to get the bill through. Two Democrats remained opposed to the bill, saying the Senate measure didn't include tough enough regulations.

 

Republican Senators Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins from Maine, Chuck Grassley from Iowa, and Scott Brown from Massachusetts all voted yes, with Grassley saying that this bill sends a message  to Wall Street.

"There’s no question this bill has flaws," Grassley said. "Big banks and financial institutions took advantage at the expense of average Americans, and the system let them get away with it.  This bill takes a step in the direction of trying to fix things.” 

The bill, S. 3217, creates a new oversight panel that will monitor financial companies and their dealings with consumers. The most controversial portion of the bill is the derivatives regulation provision, inserted by Sen. Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark. With that provision the bill imposes regulations on bank trading practices—something that hasn’t existed in the past.

At the heart of this bill is an attempt to keep financial institutions from becoming too big to fail and needing the government to step to prevent major economic downfall. In 2008, the government had to intervene to save firms like AIG, Bear Stearns and government sponsored enterprises like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The bill now has to go through a reconciliation process with the House before it goes to the President’s desk.

President Barack Obama was pleased with the Senate, saying they fought hard against lobbyists who were working hard to keep this bill from going anywhere. He also expressed that this bill is to the benefit of Americans overall, and not an attempt to punish Wall Street.

“Our goal is not to punish the banks, but to protect the larger economy and the American people from the kind of upheavals that we’ve seen in the past few years," he said. "And today’s action was a major step forward in achieving that goal."

  1. # michael d

    Why are Republicans opposed to this. I would think they of all would not support financial institutions being backed by tax payer funds while making speculative investments. That is crazy. What on earth is their rational?

Search the Blog

Popular tags

2012 election 2012 elections 2013 Inauguration Ad Ad Hawk Ad Hoc AIG american crossroads Arab Spring Barack Obama BP budget Campaign contributions Campaign Finance Center for Responsive Politics Citizens United consumer banking Contracting Conventions2012 Correspondence crossroads GPS dark money Data Mine datamine debt ceiling Disclose act Distributed Research Dodd-Frank Earmarks Election 2012 Elizabeth Warren FARA FCC FDA FEC Federal Election Commission Finance Data Catalog Financial Bailout Financial Reform FLIT FOIA follow the unlimited money Foreign lobbying Foreign Lobbying Influence Tracker freshmen Fundraising Guns Handy Tools health care Hoc House House Freshmen 112th House Majority PAC Immigration Independent Expenditure Independent expenditures influence Influence Explorer investment James Bopp Jr. Lobbying lobbying tracker Logs_6553 Majority PAC Mark Sanford Market Meltdown Media Medicare meeting logs Mitt Romney National Rifle Association Newt Gingrich NRA obama OGD Open Government Directive Orrin Hatch outside spending Party Time PMA Group political ad sleuth Political Party Time Politwoops President Obama Priorities USA Action Recovery Recovery.gov Rep. John Murtha Research Restore Our Future revolving door Rick Perry Rick Santorum Romney Ron Paul Sen. Christopher Dodd Senate Sheldon Adelson states of transparency Stealthy Wealthy stimulus Sunlight Live super committee super congress Super PAC super PAC profile Super PACs supercommittee Supercongress supreme court TARP Taxpayers for Common Sense transparency