Sunlight Foundation

Pro-gun groups' influence on Connecticut politics

NRA logoSince 1996, the National Rifle Association has invested about $395,000 to influence elections in Connecticut, the state that is home to the nation's latest mass shooting tragedy. Data downloaded from Sunlight's Influence Explorer show that the nation's premier gun rights lobby has given both to federal and state candidates.

Though the NRA has not had good success in Connecticut's congressional contests, at least 15 sitting members of the state legislature received contributions from the NRA. During the most recent session of the Connecticut state legislature, some 40 pieces of legislation were introduced involving firearms, according to records retrieved by Sunlight's Open States project. Among these were a bill to loosen restrictions on those qualified to purchase assault weapons and two that would have tightened gun control laws. None of them became law.  

MORE: A complete list of NRA campaign contributions in Connecticut races.

The state of Connecticut permits carrying handguns without registration.

Since 2010, the NRA has reported spending $8,000 on lobbying at the state, records from the Office of State Ethics show, although the National Sports Shooting Foundation, another gun rights group, has invested more than $20,000 in the past year lobbying Nutmeg State lawmakers on on firearms related issues. On the federal level, the NRA has spent more than $2.2 million on lobbying on issues from firearms, right to bear arms and on homeland security issues.

MORE: For data on the gun debate, see the Sunlight Foundation's resource page.

In the 2012 elections the NRA's super PAC spent more than $16 million on electioneering ads with most of the money opposing Democrats running for Congress. But despite their largesse, their return on investment in the 2012 elections was a low 0.83%.

At the other side of the firearms debate are groups such as the Mayors Against Illegal Guns and Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, groups that have a much lower profile than the NRA and less money to spend.

(Contributing: Anupama Narayanswamy, James Turk, Louis Serino, Jake Harper, Lindsay Young and Kat Lucero)

Search the Blog

Related Content

Popular tags

2012 election 2012 elections 2013 Inauguration Ad Ad Hawk Ad Hoc AIG american crossroads Arab Spring Barack Obama BP budget Campaign contributions Campaign Finance Center for Responsive Politics Citizens United consumer banking Contracting Conventions2012 Correspondence crossroads GPS dark money Data Mine datamine debt ceiling Disclose act Distributed Research Dodd-Frank Earmarks Election 2012 Elizabeth Warren FARA FCC FDA FEC Federal Election Commission Fellows Finance Data Catalog Financial Bailout Financial Reform FLIT FOIA follow the unlimited money Foreign lobbying Foreign Lobbying Influence Tracker freshmen Fundraising Guns Handy Tools health care Hoc House House Freshmen 112th House Majority PAC Immigration Independent Expenditure Independent expenditures influence Influence Explorer investment James Bopp Jr. Lobbying lobbying tracker Logs_6553 Majority PAC Mark Sanford Market Meltdown Media Medicare meeting logs Mitt Romney National Rifle Association Newt Gingrich NRA obama OGD Open Government Directive Orrin Hatch outside spending Party Time PMA Group political ad sleuth Political Party Time Politwoops President Obama Priorities USA Action Recovery Recovery.gov Rep. John Murtha Research Restore Our Future revolving door Rick Perry Rick Santorum Romney Ron Paul Sen. Christopher Dodd Senate Sheldon Adelson states of transparency Stealthy Wealthy stimulus Sunlight Live super committee super congress Super PAC super PAC profile Super PACs supercommittee Supercongress supreme court TARP Taxpayers for Common Sense transparency