-
FEC allows candidates to solicit limited contributions for Super PACs
By Aaron Bycoffe Jun 30, 2011 11:26 a.m.The Federal Election Commission voted unanimously Thursday to allow federal candidates and party officials to solicit limited contributions for Super PACs, groups that have changed the campaign-finance landscape in the past year by raising and spending unlimited amounts from indivuals, corporations and labor unions.
Read all about it -
FEC set to vote on Super PAC fundraising by candidates
By Aaron Bycoffe Jun 29, 2011 10:32 a.m.Two new draft Advisory Opinions from the FEC's legal staff leave open the possibility that the commission will allow candidates and party officers to raise money — possibly without limits — for Super PACs.
Read all about it -
Sen. Scott Brown's campaign requests FEC approval to buy his book
By Ryan Sibley Jan 27, 2011 3:36 p.m.Republican Senator Scott Brown of Massachussetts wants to thank his campaign donors with a signed copy of his yet to be released autobiography. And in order to do so, he's asked the Federal Election Commission to allow him to buy several thousand of copies of his own book using his campaign committee's funds.
Read all about it -
RightChange.com Inc. funded by pharmaceutical industry figure
By Ryan Sibley Oct 28, 2010 9:41 a.m.Fred Eshelman, CEO of North Carolina-based Pharmaceutical Product Development, has given $3.38 million to RightChange.com, an organization taking part in the onslaught of outside spending this election cycle, according to documents filed with the IRS. Almost all of the money going to RightChange comes from Eshelman; the organization is a vehicle for him to air his political views, which happen to align with the GOP's.
Read all about it -
Surprise! The National Education Association funds the National Education Association Advocacy Fund
By Ryan Sibley Oct 27, 2010 2:27 p.m.The National Education Association Advocacy Fund, a Super PAC which has spent $4.2 million to influence the 2010 election cycle so far, receives all of it's funding from the National Education Association, a labor union—or a 501c6—and also its parent organization. No individual donors are listed.
Read all about it -
Dark money: Super PACs fueled by $97.5 million that can't be traced to donors
By Ryan Sibley Oct 20, 2010 11:31 a.m.Of the $189 million spent so far by Super PACs, non-profits and labor unions to influence the 2010 mid-term elections, $97.5 million has come from groups that do not disclose any donors, an analysis of Federal Election Commission contribution records shows. That is, about 52 percent of the money spent so far on everything from political ads to phone banks to fliers promoting or opposing federal candidates has come from groups that don't disclose the sources of their funds.*
Read all about it -
Dead end disclosure: Super PAC's biggest giver is a shadowy nonprofit with links to Sarah Palin
By Ryan Sibley Oct 20, 2010 11:29 a.m.Citizens for a Working America PAC, a political organization that's spent $250,000 to oppose the reelection of Rep. John Spratt, D-S.C., discloses its contributions to the Federal Election Commission. Its contributor (it has only one) is New Models, a Virginia-based non-profit organized under section 501(c)4 of the Internal Revenue Code, that doesn't disclose its donors.
Read all about it -
Paper trail shows ties between newly registered 'Super PAC,' other groups
By Aaron Bycoffe Oct 15, 2010 3:14 p.m.Earlier this month, Partnership for America's Future filed a letter with the Federal Election Commission declaring that it will take contributions of unlimited amounts and spend them on independent expenditures. According to its website, the organization is "dedicated to supporting efforts designed to elect Republican candidates to office during the 2010 election cycle." In the process, the recently-minted Super PAC is supporting and supported by a web of Republican operatives and institutions that have played an outsized role in the 2010 elections.
Read all about it -
The DCCC picks up spending as Election Day nears
By Ryan Sibley Oct 7, 2010 5:18 p.m.In just three days, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has spent nearly $7 million in independent expenditures—doubling their spending in this arena to $14 million. On Monday, it was reported that the DCCC had spent only $7 million in IEs for the entire election cycle to support its party's attempt to maintain power in congress.
Read all about it -
Editor's Notebook: Following the muddled money
By Bill Allison Oct 7, 2010 3:03 p.m.Over the weekend, I came across a new group in our Follow the Unlimited Money tool called CSS Action Fund. I googled the group and didn't find anything about it; by Monday they'd set up a website. Curious, I asked Ryan Sibley, who's been all things post-Citizens United for us, to see what she could find out about the group.
Read all about it -
'Grassroots' group grows mainly in offices of D.C. law and PR firms
By Ryan Sibley Oct 7, 2010 11:54 a.m.A political committee called Citizens for Strength and Security Action Fund--usually abbreviated as CSS Action Fund--claims to be active across the country promoting the best solutions to America's problems, but the limited disclosures available about the group suggest that it's a creature of the beltway. The organization, which made its first noise in the 2010 mid-term elections by spending $640,000 supporting Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash in late September, shares a Washington, D.C. address with similar advocacy groups and lists political pros as its main players.*
Read all about it -
NRCC spends big, flexes power
By Ryan Sibley Oct 4, 2010 11:23 a.m.The National Republican Congressional Committee reported spending more than $800,000 on one day, Friday Oct. 1, in opposition to 30 Democrats. The NRCC has spent almost $13.7 million in independent expenditures to oppose Democrats so far this election cycle, tops among all groups as of this writing.
Read all about it -
Outside groups spending record amounts on mid-term elections
By Ryan Sibley Sep 23, 2010 12:06 p.m.Since January 2010, spending by outside organizations to influence congressional elections totals some $57 million--up more than $20 million from a comparable time period in 2006, the most recent non-presidential election cycle--according to reports collected by the Federal Election Commission.
Read all about it -
AP report highlights lack of disclosure in campaign finance world
By Ryan Sibley Sep 20, 2010 3:19 p.m.A report put out by the Asoociated Press today highlights the lack of disclosure of money spent to influence mid-term elections. The story highlights the successful fundraising efforts by American Crossroads and Crossroads GPS, two Republican-leaning organizations created by top Bush administration advisors, and notes that the two groups raised $14.5 million combined in one 30-day period that ended on Sunday.
Read all about it
Search the Blog
Real Time Ticker
Recent Posts
- Super PAC spending crosses $100 million: Where did it all go?
- Facebook in Washington: Baby steps of a giant
- JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon met with Treasury Secretary on Volcker in March
- Trying to track JPMorgan? Treasury Dodd-Frank meeting logs not up to date
- Super PAC profile: Ending Spending aids Palin-endorsed Senate hopeful in Nebraska
Reporting we're watching
- Sunlight Foundation: Is Congress getting dumber, or just more plainspoken?
- Sunlight Foundation: Congress far from exemplary in SAT word proficiency
- Sunlight Foundation: The changing complexity of congressional speech
- Sunlight Foundation: Two Steps Forward on Improving Public Access to Legislative Information
- OpenSecrets: Mystery Health Care Group Funneled Millions to Conservative Nonprofits
